racist claim

Beer is good

52% chance of the opponent winning

Round #1

The challenger argues that beer cannot be racist as it is merely a drink, labeling the opponent's claim as unfounded. The opponent counters by asserting that beer's colonial origins render it racist, though this argument lacks detailed evidence to support its implications.

Challenger

Beer can not be rastist, its just a drink, it is an unbased claim

Opponent

Beer is bad because it was made by colonisers and is therefore racist

Logic
4.0 vs 5.0
Evidence
2.0 vs 3.0
Objectivity
6.0 vs 5.0

Next Move

Both sides have submitted for Round 1.

AI evaluation complete. Continue to Round 2 to provide more arguments.

Challenger: Round 2 Opponent: Round 2